<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Extremal Set Theory | Nikola Veselinov</title><link>https://nikolaveselinov.com/tags/extremal-set-theory/</link><atom:link href="https://nikolaveselinov.com/tags/extremal-set-theory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Extremal Set Theory</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>On the current state of the Union-closed sets conjecture</title><link>https://nikolaveselinov.com/post/union-closed-conjecture-note/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://nikolaveselinov.com/post/union-closed-conjecture-note/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction">Introduction&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The union-closed sets conjecture is a famous open problem in set theory.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A family of sets is said to be &lt;em>union-closed&lt;/em> if the union of any two sets from the family also belongs to it.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="conjecture">
&lt;strong>
Conjecture (Frankl, 1979).
&lt;/strong>
For every union-closed family containing a non-empty set there exists an element that belongs to at least half of the sets in the family.
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Let&amp;rsquo;s switch to formal notation. Let $\mathcal{F}\subseteq\mathscr{P}(n)$ be a family of subsets of $[n]=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ and denote $m=|\mathcal{F}|$. For each $x\in[n]$ define the &lt;em>degree&lt;/em> of $x$ in $\mathcal{F}$ as the number of sets containing $x$:
&lt;/p>
$$
d_x:=|\{i\in[m]:x\in F_i\}|
$$&lt;p>
and the &lt;em>normalized degree&lt;/em> (i.e., the fraction of sets the element belongs to) as $\tilde d_x=\frac{d_x}{m}$.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>We can now reformulate the union-closed sets conjecture and state it using the introduced terminology.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="conjecture">
&lt;strong>
Conjecture.
&lt;/strong>
Let $\mathcal{F}\subseteq\mathscr{P}(n)$ be a family of sets such that for any $A,B\in\mathcal{F}$ we have $A\cup B\in\mathcal{F}$. Then
$$
\max_{i\in[n]}\tilde d_i\geq\frac{1}{2}\text{.}
$$
&lt;/div>
&lt;h2 id="results-so-far">Results so far&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>A breakthrough has been the proof of $\max_{i\in[n]}\tilde d_i\geq c$ for the constant $c=0.01$ by Justin Gilmer in 2022 &lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09055v2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">arXiv:2211.09055v2&lt;/a> through an entropy-based approach. See the video below for a lecture by him outlining the discovery.&lt;/p>
&lt;div style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
&lt;iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" loading="eager" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/veMx-r1iQpY?autoplay=0&amp;controls=1&amp;end=0&amp;loop=0&amp;mute=0&amp;start=0" style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border:0;" title="YouTube video"
>&lt;/iframe>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Since he uses entropy, he formulates the conjecture probabilistically:&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="conjecture">
&lt;strong>
Conjecture.
&lt;/strong>
Let $\mathcal{F}\subseteq\mathscr{P}(n)$ be a family of sets such that for any $A,B\in\mathcal{F}$ we have $A\cup B\in\mathcal{F}$. Then
$$
\max_{i\in[n]}\tilde d_i\geq\frac{1}{2}\text{.}
$$
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Through subsequent papers, the constant has been improved to $c\approx0.3823455$ (&lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12500v2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">arXiv:2212.12500v2&lt;/a>). Evidence suggests it could be improved further, see the &lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08824" target="_blank" rel="noopener">work&lt;/a> of Liu from 2023.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>I feel confident that progress will be made in the years to follow. It would be of great interest to see if a constant (or, in the best case, the complete) lower bound can be derived using some other approach, maybe even a purely combinatorial one.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>